pearleus

วันอาทิตย์ที่ 5 มิถุนายน พ.ศ. 2554

มารู้จักบทบรรณาธิการให้เพิ่มขึ้นกันดีกว่า

มารู้จักบทบรรณาธิการให้เพิ่มขึ้นกันดีกว่า
   สวัสดีค่ะ  ท่านผู้อ่านที่รักทุกคน  มาแล้วค่ะ  มาพร้อมกับเรื่องราว  สาระดีมีประโยชน์  ที่นี่ที่เดียว  ไม่ใช่โฆษณาขายของนะคะ  แต่เป็นความตั้งใจที่อยากให้แต่สิ่งดีๆ กับคุณผู้อ่านทุกท่านค่ะ  ครั้งที่แล้วผู้เขียนได้เสนอเรื่องราวความรู้เล็ก ๆ น้อยๆ เกี่ยวกับบทบรรณาธิการไปบ้างแล้ว  ครั้งนี้เลยขอเพิ่มเติมความรู้กันหน่อยนะคะ  ก็อย่างที่เราทราบกันดีนะคะว่าบทบรรณาธิการมีความสำคัญต่อผู้อ่าน  และก็ต้องขึ้นอยู่กับผู้เขียนด้วยว่าต้องการนำเสนออะไร  เพื่อใคร  ดังนั้นเราจึ้งต้องทราบถึงบทบาทและหน้าที่ที่ดีของผู้เขียนบทบรรณาธิการก่อนนะคะว่าเป็นอย่างไร
1. บทบาทของบรรณาธิการ
 1.1  เป็นแหล่งอุดมการณ์ของหนังสือพิมพ์  นิตยสาร  วารสาร  ในการชี้นำสังคม
 1.2  เปิดโอกาสให้ประชาชนโต้แย้งถกเถียงได้ตามบรรยากาศประชาธิปไตย
 1.3  เป็นตัวแทนในการลำดับความสำคัญของเหตุการณ์  ที่มีผลกระทบต่อประชาชนโดยการสร้างความเข้าใจ  ขจัดความสับสนจากการรายงานข่าวต่าง ๆ ในสังคม
 1.4  ช่วยทำให้ผู้อ่านทราบข้อเท็จจริงเกี่ยวกับข่าวอย่างละเอียด
 1.5   เป็นผู้ต่อสู้เพื่อผลประโยชน์ของส่วนรวม   ปกป้องเสรีภาพของประชาชน
 1.6  กระตุ้น  ปลูกฝังให้มีการแสดงออกในทรรศนะต่าง ๆ เพื่อให้เกิดความหนักแน่น  ในการตัดสินใจอย่างถูกต้อง
2.  หน้าที่ของบรรณาธิการ
  2.1  เป็นสื่อในการแสดงออกโดยมีความเป็นอันหนึ่งอันเดียวกันกับสังคม
  2.2  ช่วยส่งเสริมให้ผู้อ่านมีความคิดสร้างสรรค์ที่ดี
  2.3  เป็นส่วนช่วยสร้างความสมดุลในการรายงานข่าว
  2.4  เป็นแหล่งที่สามารถช่วยยกระดับความรู้  ความคิดของผู้อ่าน
  2.5  เป็นผู้นำทางความคิด  และเป็นสื่อกลางของสังคม
  2.6  เป็นผู้ทำหน้าที่ให้เหมาะสมกับสื่อมวลชน  ในฐานะที่เป็นองค์กรที่ได้รับความไว้วางใจจากประชาชน
 หลังจากที่เพื่อน ๆ ได้อ่านบทบาทและหน้าที่ของบรรณาธิการไปกันแล้ว  รู้สึกว่ายิ่งใหญ่และมีความสำคัญต่อสังคมไทยมากเลยใช่มั้ยคะ  พิมพ์อักษรก็รู้สึกแบบนั้นเหมือนกันค่ะ  แต่ก็ดีนะคะทำให้เรารู้สึกภูมิใจจังเลย  ว่าถ้าเราได้มีหน้าที่เขียนบทบรรณาธิการก็คงจะดีมากเลย  เพราะฉะนั้นก่อนที่เราจะได้มีหน้าที่เขียนบทบรรณาธิการ  เราก็ต้องเริ่มฝึกให้เก่งกันตั้งแต่วันนี้เลยเป็นไงค่ะ  งั้นผู้เขียนขอเพิ่มเติมข้อมูลบางอย่างสำหรับวันนี้นะคะ  ก็คือลักษณะบทบรรณาธิการที่ดีนั้นต้อง

1.  ข้อมูลหรือข้อเท็จจริงต้องมีความถูกต้องและชัดเจน
 2.  เรื่องที่เขียนควรอยู่ในกระแสหรือเป็นที่สนใจของประชาชนทั่วไป
 3.  เนื้อหาสาระต้องเป็นประโยชน์ต่อสังคมส่วนรวม
 4.  มีเหตุผลสนับสนุนน่าเชื่อถือ
 5.  เขียนด้วยความเป็นกลาง  ไม่ลำเอียง  เข้าข้างฝ่ายใดฝ่ายหนึ่ง
 6.  ใช้ภาษาที่สุภาพ 
 7.  มีวัตถุประสงค์การเขียนที่ชัดเจน
 8.  มีการแสดงความคิดเห็นอย่างต่อเนื่อง  ไม่ขาดตอน
 นี่ล่ะค่ะเพื่อน ๆ คือลักษณะของการเขียนบทบรรณาธิการที่ดี  หวังว่าคงไม่ยากเกินความสามารถนะคะ  ขอให้เพื่อน ๆ ทุกคนเริ่มหัดเขียนและเขียนให้สนุกนะคะ  ไปแล้วค่ะ

วันอังคารที่ 18 มกราคม พ.ศ. 2554

Exclusive: Inside the Mind of a Legal Interpreter

12 December 2009

Interviewer: Pattaya Daily News
Legal Interpreter: Warina  Punyawan



Often people wonder how Thai court cases are decided, time and again we see minor or none existent charges going to court, where there is often a decidedly negative outcome. As you may be aware PDN have assisted in a variety of cases over the years, with an outstanding success record to date.


None of these positive outcomes could have been achieved without the aid of PDN’s professional interpreter, who has worked closely with the same honest and reputable Thai lawyer for many years. The negative press that appears in the media in regards to the Thai judicial system is largely warranted; however it is PDN’s experience that with the aid of a good legal team and a strong argument, the chances of success are no better or worse than in any other country in the world. But it is clear that once involved in the judicial proceedings of a foreign country, acquiring the means to communicate accurately and clearly must be the highest priority. As in any other culture, Thai magistrates do not consider ignorance an excuse.
The following is a brief interview conducted with PDN’s interpreter, where we discover what it is like to work in the midst of the Thai judicial system, attempting to achieve a successful outcome, at times against extreme prejudice and corruption.

Do you ever get frustrated or disappointed when you’re assisting foreigners with their legal battles?

Yes! Many times – actually, all the cases. Have you ever imagined what it would be like to be the victim of a crime, or be accused of committing a crime? You don’t speak Thai, you don’t understand the legal system, and you’re trying to communicate as best you can with lawyers and police. Sounds like a nightmare. Once you have hired a lawyer, you seem to expect your lawyer or your interpreter to answer your phone, spare time for you 24 hrs, so this is what I call a “Nightmare” for me.


The reasons I get frustrated are:
1. The foreigner [involved in the case] hasn’t studied Thai law and even, in some cases, shows complete ignorance of the law in their own country. So they don’t know the procedures. They expect everything to be done quickly. They’re not aware that Pattaya is the busiest court in Thailand handling a large variety of foreign nationals. I also have to make sure that I don’t translate or explain to them incorrectly. For example, there were three different interpretations of the same thing; like when you say “I dont care” it has a much more aggressive meaning in Thai.
2. Our lawyer doesn’t speak any English at all, so most of the time they have to rely on the skill of the interpreter – which is me! Also, contrary to the generally accepted image, our lawyer is a relaxed character, who smiles a lot and is always polite. He is one of the best lawyers I have ever worked with. Sometimes his explanations to me, particularly on points of law, are not enough to convey the full meaning to our clients so I have had to learn to trust him – and so far so good.
3. The foreign clients fail to respect the rules of the court. On so many occasions I’ve had to tell them not to their cross legs, not to laugh or smile when they’re supposed to be sad, not to ask sarcastic questions, not to speak out of turn, not to try and educate the lawyer or the judge and, most importantly, not to act like some big shot farang.


Why don’t you work with an English speaking lawyer?
Because then they don’t need me. There are good and bad lawyers everywhere in the world. Many of those lawyers operating in Thailand who are fluent in English call themselves professional but have no idea of how the courts work. In Pattaya, there are many foreign victims who have heard about all the bad things that can happen to innocent people.
So if they are involved in a case and they have money, they just go straight to the so called “professionals” and they don’t mind paying a fortune, even if they don’t win the case.
The professional lawyer will manage to come up with a nice apology and sometimes persuade the client to continue the case at a higher level even though they know they will lose anyway.
I’m not saying there are no good lawyers in Pattaya. They do exist. The same goes for the court judges in Pattaya and Chonburi but it’s unfortunate we can’t publish the names of those who have shown genuine professionalism and integrity.

So you prefer to work with good lawyers who are smart, honest and dedicated to their work but don’t speak English, why?
Because at least then it’s easier for me to see if he’s greedy, over charges or unnecessarily prolongs the case just to make more money. He has to work with me as a team and he knows that I can never support such malpractices because my intention is to prove to foreigners that our Thai justice system is not that bad. There isn’t corruption everywhere all the time as is the general opinion. I think often the problem is all to do with poor communication.

Is your prime motive as an interpreter to make money?
No, not intentionally, just coincidentally through my routine job as the owner and Editor of PDN. I try to improve on my work each day. I’d had enough of reporting the same things over and over again every year. All of our news comes from the same group of Thai reporters and we are all friends [except ones that they might not like us much because we upload news late and they cannot copy on time!]

I, myself have been cheated in a few cases and received unfair and bad treatment from the police and government officers just like every decent Thai who tries to survive in this town. I have been teaching English to Thais and vice versa. I have also become aware of the corruption and monopoly systems in this town, not to mention Thailand as a whole.

For example, I see poor people who rely on the tourist industry for their survival suffering each day. The rich and the powerful don’t seem to care. They just want to make as much money as fast as they can, including foreign investors.
The difference between locals and the visitors is that the visitors can leave anytime they choose, just as many are doing now, fed up with our political unrest, perceived high crime rate, corruption, global economics, gangsters, mafia, and whatever other problems there are. The investors are marching out of Thailand or Pattaya, that’s what we’re hearing now but I can see it from another point of view and I’m sure one day things will get better for Pattaya IF the officials spare more time to fix the really serious problems rather than spending so many resources on trying to promote the city like they are doing now.

I have changed my attitude a lot since helping people in the court. I am proud to say that we do have generous and fair judges.

In the recent case with Barry, the female judge presiding was so straight and independent. She gave him a lot of opportunity to talk and even act out the events in his case even though most of it was irrelevant. I think she allowed it because she seemed to know that he was angry and disappointed. She calmly and patiently listened to him and I had to tell her I had to translate every word and act like him as well. She tried to hold her smile and said “okay, no need, I understand, tell him that the story he just told has nothing to do with the case so it won’t go on record.”

For me it has often been just like the “chicken and the egg.” Sometimes I don’t know what I should do first. My priorities are changing every day. Sometimes I have to drop my routine job and rush to interview a subject more interesting to me even though it won’t be published, but that’s just my nature.

These cases all involve a lot of running around but I also have to pay my bills too! Our income comes from our sponsors who have been growing in number each year. My lawyer normally charges a very reasonable fee by Thai standards. Barry nearly paid a lawyer in Bangkok 2 million baht after paying his first lawyer 200,000 baht up front, none of which was returned to him. We charged him only 100,000 baht. So it’s not about money, you know. Though I can’t say it’s for fun, either. These cases can involve a lot of homework and searching for and researching information. This incurs cost, both in time and effort, and at times we put ourselves at risk, so I suppose it’s only fair we should receive some funds for what we do.

The case of "Barry And The Plastic Knife" How did you meet Barry?

He sent me an Email and his long story 

What did you think about his first Email?
I didn’t like it. Actually I forwarded it to one of my editors to correspond with him. He suggested in his email that he would be doing us a favor by letting us publish his story. Things may work that way in his home country, but not here. He even said in the mail that “we will let you publish my story for free, we won’t charge you for it!”


So why you decided to take his case?
It was interesting and I had a feeling Barry had something to hide and wasn’t telling me the whole truth.


After I looked at the documents and listened to the whole story and observed his acting showing me how it all happened, we then decided to have a meeting with my lawyer, who lives in Bangkok, on the next day in my office.
The lawyer read through the entire document and said immediately “easy case, take it!”
I couldn’t really tell Barry exactly what the lawyer said because he would shake his head and ask too many questions. I know I would run out of patience if I had to carefully explain to him. I just told Barry and his wife that we have never lost a case so far, not because we are that good or we have connections but because we only choose cases which we have more than an 80% chance of winning. In his case, he had been wrongly charged, which we cannot criticize here as it was due to his first lawyer. So Barry sent me all the emails of correspondence with his lawyer and I could see that there were some communication errors which had made Barry so frustrated.

What were the specific difficulties with this case?
1.Barry didn’t believe or trust us 100%. He expected us to report to him everyday what we were doing in his case, which is impossible. We had studied his case, and the main point was that we saw that we could win.
2. The original translation by his wife was good but we knew that the truth about what happened may be not useful in court. It was also difficult for me to tell him the judge would not take into account his background.
3. The strange thing was that Barry re-shaped the knife. He made it look different from the original pictures taken by his first lawyer. Even now, I don’t understand why he did this, but my lawyer said it didn’t matter. All we had to do was prove it wasn’t a case of attempted murder.
4. Most of the time they were expecting me to act like a machine, translating Thai into English word for word, both accurately and quickly without any breaks or problems “that’s just not the way it works.” I know if I get it wrong the consequences could be enormous on Barry’s life, this is why I had to handle every question and response with great delicacy. If such care is not taken in every case an innocently accused person might be found guilty, or a criminal might escape conviction. For example; Barry was asked a question by the prosecutor, which I interpreted for him. In a roundabout way he began to answer; however his answer was not directly in response to the question. I proceeded to whisper to him, “That’s not what they asked you,” before I interpreted only the relevant details back to the prosecution. Although it was the wrong thing to do, I was confident of Barry’s innocence and that he was aware that I was trying to present his case in the clearest possible way.

I chose not to publish his two part articles on PDN into Thai because it may affect his case. However, working with Barry was interesting. We turned out to be friends, especially with his wife Bee. I will join her for her next meditation. I would also like to thank Allan, Barry’s friend, who turned up to be his witness and also Bee – she did a pretty good job describing her husband’s character which almost made us burst out laughing in the court! And our goddess, the judge, my favourite judge, I owe her a bunch of flowers.

The most important thing that I must mention here is thank you both, Barry and Bee, for sticking with us till the end to prove that Thai justice is not that bad. You were good fighters and chose to do the right thing. I know of so many cases where the Thai wives have told their Farang husbands to give up and pay money under the table to drop the case.

Barry has now been found innocent and is free, but he has a record of assault and was fined 3750 baht. The judge did ask me to tell him : “Next time, don’t try to solve the problem yourself. You must inform the police.”


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allan’s case [ One Mans Crusade for Justice ]

How did you meet him?
By email.


Why did you decide to help him?
He had all the documents to back up his case. Each time I interviewed him, he never changed his story.
His lawyer could not communicate with him and also he [the lawyer] admitted that he was afraid of Mr. H [Allan’s defendant]

What were the specific difficulties with this  case?
1. It involved government officials and powerful people within the Pattaya community. I’m sure that there are many brave interpreters here in Thailand, who are aware of the dangerous positions that we put ourselves in at times. In some cases these positions could be life-threatening, when the other members of the community around us don’t in fact understand what our role is.
2. After I started to get involved, I had to run around alone – I put “alone” here delibrately – in Pattaya to find more information while Allan did likewise in Bangkok. Okay, by doing that he did help quite a lot, but also it was quite risky to spread his plan around, which made me get even more frustrated.
3. He had 8 months to arrange a new lawyer but he didn’t contact me except to keep posting comments on the similar cases we were reporting in PDN, intending to inform the readers that he was facing big corrupted officials or mafia in the court case in Pattaya. The more he posted the more he put people off because it became tedious and nobody really cared to help anymore. This also included the likes of the DSI, the ministry of transportation, the previous Chonburi governor, etc. Everyone was busy and his case was never the first thing on their priorities anyway.

So what’s the situation now?
On the 3rd December, his previous lawyer had dropped the case and we found out that the case was actually out of date. I knew he was working in collusion with someone else, whose name I can’t mention here. But the judge was very understanding and wondered why the lawyer would do that. He said it wasn’t fair, so the judge let the case be postponed until May 2010. Allan now has a Thai lawyer friend who has volunteered to help him.

After the court, during our lunch, I talked to his new lawyer and we both knew his chances of winning were very slim. So I decided to take Allan to the Pattaya City Mayor’s office that afternoon.

This time, I called my reporter friends from all the national newspapers in Bangkok telling them that Allan would be holding a press conference about his court case related to the boat accident and the loss of his brother. Also, we had coincidentally reported about another boat accident 2 days before.

That afternoon, in Khun Ronnakit Ekasingse, the deputy mayor’s office, we printed out Allan’s stories both in Thai and English and took a video tape of his interview. I had noticed that none of those officers were interested in reading the one in English which was quite strongly worded. They had a quick look at the Thai version which contained some photos of the involved people.

We had to explain through many officials [ his secretaries, many involved deputy mayors including Mr. Sanit Boonmachai] and finally Khun Ittipon sat down casually to listen to us. Allan’s story had actually never been sent to the Mayor. Khun Ittiphol asked me, ”I have never heard this before, who is Mr. H, what does H stand for?”

I was really impressed to see his eyes gently looking at Allan and asked him some warm questions as to what he could do to help. I told him that 400,000 baht is nothing for Mr. H, but if he feels it’s too much, somehow the city or an organization must share the responsibilities.

Khun Ittipon promised us that within one week he would get back to us!
And I loved when he told us, “No one can be above the law!!”
We left the city hall with hope.



One Mans Crusade for Justice

Finally Minor Recompense in Allan’s Continual Fight for Justice



วันอังคารที่ 1 มิถุนายน พ.ศ. 2553

Minor Recompense in Allan’s Continual Fight for Justice

Ilhan ‘Allan’ Ozturk recently received a much needed positive contribution, from the Pattaya City Mayor, in his continuing fight for justice over the death of his beloved brother Ilhami. Although Mayor Itthiphol Khunpluem’s generous personal contribution was well received, Allan voiced his determination to continue to fight against the maritime administrators and private individuals who are attempting to avoid accountability over his brother’s tragic death off Koh Larn in 2006.

Pattaya, the 1st of June 2010 [Pattaya Daily News]:

 Ilhami Ozturk [36], a Turkish national, was the leader of a tour group ferrying fellow Turkish nationals from Pattaya to Koh Larn on the 5th of December 2006. On the return journey, in weather conditions that had forced many operators to cease transportation, the overcrowded, poorly maintained and uninsured boat that 18 strong tour group were travelling on sank,, approximately 1 kilometer off the coast of Koh Larn.

Fighting in rough seas for two hours with an insufficient amount of life jackets, two passengers where admitted to the Bangkok-Pattaya Hospital with shock and Ilhami Ozturk was never seen alive again. Despite not being a strong swimmer, Ilhami as the tour leader, forfeited his floatation vest to one of the other tourists. Rescuers took more than 2 hours to attend the scene, which was no more the 1km from Koh Larn and a fully operational emergency response team.

Ilhami’s brother Allan has been desperately fighting through the Thai legal system for nearly 4 years to gain some form of compensation or accountability for his brother’s avoidable death, but as yet to no avail. Tuesdays donation of Bt200,000 from Pattaya City Mayor Itthiphol Khunpluem, although gratefully accepted, is not even a third of the expense that Allan and his family have incurred whilst financial Ilhami’s repatriation, funeral and legal fees. Since the day of his brothers unfortunate death, Allan has claimed to have spent close to Bt1 million.

Thanking the Mayor for his generosity and hard work in attempting to assist in his fight for justice, Allan voiced his determination to continue the fight against the administrators and private individuals that were avoiding accountability over the death of Ilhami. The somewhat complicated, ‘bureaucratic’ and at times political civil suit against the owner of the boat and the tour company to which it belonged, has involved both local and national administrators. National administrations in the form of the Thai Ministry of Transportation and the National Human Rights Commission have been contacted, who have as yet proved powerless to affect the outcome of proceeding, although acknowledging that there is indeed a case.

At present only a criminal case against the 19-year-old driver for “negligence in operating a motorboat” has seen a result, after over 2-years in court. The young man was handed a 2-year suspended prison sentence by the magistrate who took into account the driver’s age and clean criminal record. He is now currently operating another tourist tour boat in the Pattaya waters, still without the ‘required’ licensing.

The owner of the boat and tour company, referred to as Mr. H in our attached features, has had no apparent action having taken against him by the Maritime Authorities in Pattaya. Despite confirmed reports that the boat has not be registered or insured and that the crash was not even reported to the higher authorities in Bangkok, as is procedure, Mr. H has not been reprimanded by any of the applicable authorities and is still freely operating despite the presence of a serious lawsuit pending against him and his company.
Unfortunately, due to some extenuating circumstances and poor management of Allen’s lawsuit by the initial legal representative, Allen’s fight has been further hampered by prolonged ‘due processes’ and judicial proceedings. Despite having no clear end in sight Allan is determined to proceed with the case, even if the end result merely highlights the inadequacies and mismanagement of the maritime authorities operating in Pattaya.

Below we have a brief interview with Allan regarding his current sentiments on his continuing fight and the generosity of Pattaya’s Mayor in donating Bt200,000 to his cause.

PDN’s Exclusive Interview with Mayor Itthiphol Khunpluem
PDN: Having followed Allan’s case for sometime and supporting the idea of mediation with Mr. H, which has been unsuccessful, why have you decided to help by donating your own money? Do you think in doing so you opened the door for other people to come running?

Itthiphol: I have decided to act in this case due to the extreme length of time that Allan has been fighting unsuccessfully in court. It is the collective will of Pattaya City Hall and all of its administrators to treat both tourists and local businesses with equality, however; in this case it seems that the business/boat owner is not accepting his responsibility in this matter and has been delaying the legal processes as a result. In an effort to achieve a positive result I have decided to assist Allan by donating Bt200,000 of my own money. I am not expecting a ‘wave’ of similar incidents, Allan’s fight is relatively unique.

PDN: Surely you realise that, for Allan, this case is not just about the money, but about the inadequacies of the ‘system’ in dealing with basic human rights and consumer protection laws? In addition, what is your long term plan to change the current situation in regards to the enforcement of applicable maritime laws, which have been proved inadequate?

Itthiphol: Our duty of care as the city administrators means that we can effectively manage and somewhat control the laws of water transportation in the region. At present we are extensively cooperating with the national administrators and the Harbour Department in dealing with the effective management of all maritime laws. Two organisations, the Boat Cooperative and the Boat Association have been setup to monitor the water transportation in Pattaya Bay and the surrounding waterways and regulate the businesses and boats operating in the region.

Allan’s case is exceptional in terms of the length of time that it has taken to get a result, however; Allan’s fight and your [Pattaya Daily News] involvement has definitely helped to highlight inefficiencies in our maritime management, particularly after the recent Chinese tour boat accident. Allan has succeeded in ‘shaking’ up the maritime departments and making it known that procedures are there to be followed and flaunting of the laws will not be tolerated.

PDN: Is there still a special tourist advice department in existence?
Itthiphol: We do still have an advice department, but it has now been separated into varying categories and is handled by individual departments relevant to the given complaint. Police/criminal matters are handled by the Pattaya or Chon-Buri police stations, whilst the Tourist Police and Volunteer Police are also delegated to assist in handling tourists complaints. Although we receive many direct complaints through the Pattaya City Hall we now pass them onto the relevant departments which are setup or entrusted to deal with the issue. Each city department has its own budgets and procedures for rectifying complaints etc. We encourage all city departments to take appropriate actions in dealing with complaints to make sure any issues are resolved so as not to tarnish Pattaya’s image.
PDN: Do you feel as though we [Pattaya Daily News] or Allan have pressured you in this case, which obviously involves a very well connected and influential man in the Pattaya City area? Did you feel responsible to pay some form of damages to Allan yourself?
Itthiphol: I have not felt pressured as such, but definitely both I and the entire Pattaya administration departments concerned feel some form of responsibility in Allan’s case. We are talking about the death of a human being, a possibly avoidable death that along with Allan’s fight and your perusal of the story in the media has helped us to see the deficiencies in our regulations in terms of maritime transport. This case will hopefully change the system for the benefit of all individuals involved and make people aware that we are trying to change the system for the greater good.

Allan has a right to continue with his fight against all people involved with his brother’s death. I fully realise that donating Bt200,000 to Allan does not alleviate the emotion cost of losing his brother, nor do I expect that it has covered even a fraction of the cost of his current legal fees and other expenses. I did not feel responsible to pay Allan any money, but have done so out of my own personal will and compassion for his difficult and prolonged fight through the courts.

Written by: Warina Punyawan

วันจันทร์ที่ 2 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2552

One Mans Crusade for Justice


02 March 2009 :: 20:03:12 pm 1164

This should be read by anyone interested in what happens when a foreigner in Thailand decides to single handedly take on the system and fight for justice. I hope that this account will offer some guidance to anyone in a similar situation.

In November 2008 I received an email from “Alan” ( full name Ilhan Ozturk) asking for my assistance. I thought it was just another one of the many similar emails I’ve received from my readers over the last two years. However, even though his English was at times hard to understand, the story Alan had to tell attracted my attention.

I spoke to him on the phone and he decided to travel from Bangkok to Pattaya to see me at my office where we chatted for some time. I became very moved by what he told me and my interest was further aroused when I realized I was well acquainted with one of the key antagonists involved in his story.

At about 11:45 on the 5th December 2006, a speed boat operated by a well known local operator was carrying a group of Turkish tourists from Pattaya Beach to Koh Lahn island, a trip lasting just 15 minutes. The sea on that day was particularly rough and red flags were flying advising boats to stay ashore. The 19-year-old boatman ignored the warnings and headed at full speed for the island oblivious to the requests from the passengers to slow down.

At approximately 1 km from its destination the structure of the boat failed, the hull split and the vessel began to take on water and sink. The 18 passengers onboard then realized that their number was more than the boat’s official capacity of 12 and with a sense of panic discovered that there were only 13 lifejackets onboard.

The tour leader took command of the situation and told everyone to calm down, reassuring them that they were not far from the rescue services and help would arrive within 10 to 20 minutes. He handed out the limited number of lifejackets to the passengers, but not to himself, even though he knew he wasn’t a strong swimmer and wouldn’t manage to survive long in the water.

As the boat sank the passengers ended up in the rough sea swimming and hanging on to anything available to keep them afloat. Another boat passed by and managed to pick up a few of the passengers but inexplicably continued on its journey without waiting for additional help to appear.

The rescue team didn’t arrive until 2 pm, 2 hours after the accident. It remains a mystery as to why the rescue service, based on Koh Lahn just a few minutes from the scene of the accident, took so long to respond.Most of the passengers were in shock and two of them were admitted to the ICU at Bangkok Pattaya Hospital. The tour leader, who had remained calm and reassured his group throughout the crisis, disappeared into the sea and he was never seen alive again. The tour leader was Alan’s younger brother, Ilhami. He was 36 years old and married with a young son
.
At the time Alan was running a restaurant in Pattaya and on hearing of the accident he rushed to the scene to help search for his brother. He contacted local officials to help with the search but none was forthcoming. Even the company which owned the boat was not interested in offering any assistance. To Alan’s surprise and dismay the search was called off after a few hours. No other attempts were made, either officially or otherwise, to find Ilhami’s body.
Two days later his brother’s body was found, purely by chance, by a fisherman. Alan assumed local officials would assist him with the necessary arrangements such as the autopsy and the procedure to send his brother’s body back home to Turkey. However, neither local and government agencies nor the boat company offered any help at all and the burden was on Alan alone, grieving at the loss of his brother, to fund the costs and take care of all the practical and legal formalities.

After sending his brother’s body home, Alan decided to sue the boat owner, who happens to be a well connected businessman in Pattaya who I’ll call “Mr. H”. Mr. H refused to take responsibility even though the boat was revealed to be in a poor condition and lacked a technical certificate and insurance. It was then suggested to Alan that he sue the boatman who had been charged with reckless operation of his motorboat. The boatman also had no licence.fter 2 long years the criminal case against the boatman finally ended. The young man confessed and he was punished with a jail term of two years. With no previous criminal record, the sentence was conditional and he was free to go back to his job driving rotten, uninsured boats from Pattaya beach to Kho Lahn every day.

Alan’s brother “Ilhami”
” I JUST WANT JUSTICE FOR THE DEATH OF MY BROTHER” Alan
By this time, in 2007, Alan had learned that there was more to the case than he previously realized. The boat owner, it seems, had friends in high places, including high ranking Pattaya officials and the police. His lawyer had suggested that Alan should sue Mr. H for negligence. It would be a civil case and might take some time, but it was the only way to get something out of this very influential and powerful man.

At our meeting in my office Alan showed me a big stack of documents including letters from his embassy, the TAT, the Minister of Transportation, The Pattaya TAT and the Pattaya City hall itself.

I really felt sorry for Alan, who was reaching the end of his tether. It also became very apparent he had difficulty communicating with his lawyer and I decided to get myself involved.

Mr. Sanit Boonmachai
Among the many officials Alan had tried to contact, but without success, was Mr. Sanit Boonmachai whose department at Pattaya City Hall has ultimate responsibility for the licensing and control of all marine vessels in Pattaya. Alan told me this man was very powerful. I smiled and told Alan “Yes, he is. I also know why this guy has been avoiding you”. Unbeknown to Alan, one of the main election canvassers for Mr. Satit and his team of officials was Mr. H.
That day we went to City Hall and, not surprisingly, Mr. Sanit was unavailable to see us and we instead ended up enjoying the hospitality and smiles of the City Hall secretaries and hostesses. We had lunch at a small restaurant where we spoke further and I could ask Alan what exactly he wanted.

He was now becoming very frustrated. His brother had been dead for two years. The boatman was forgiven and now back at work. Alan originally intended to sue the Mr. H for 12 million Baht but was told he needed to lodge security with the court, an amount which was beyond his means. He consequently reduced his claim to 1.6 million Baht.

I told him if he carried on with the court case, it could take up to 5 years to get the 1.6 million so it may be better to come to a compromise. Alan said he’d already had five such “compromise” meetings and four times Mr. H never turned up. It had already cost him a lot of money to travel back and forth from Bangkok to Pattaya and sometimes from overseas. At the last meeting, two months previous, the defendant’s lawyer said they agreed to pay 400,000 Baht.

Alan refused the offer and was really upset that such a small value was put on his brother’s life and the hardship facing his brother’s son and widow. Mr. H had also claimed Alan’s brother refused to wear a lifejacket and that at the time of the accident he was drunk.

Alan’s next meeting was to take place the following day at the Pattaya District Court, where I agreed to be his interpreter.

In the two months since the offer of 400,000 Baht, Alan had thought things through carefully and, with his mother now very sick back home, he had come to the decision he would just accept the amount on the table and put this all behind him, even though he instinctively felt the defendant would never actually pay.

Anyway, the next day we went to court. I also invited along an English friend as an observer. There were several cases to be heard that day, Alan’s being the last. The second case involved two young Thai men who were sentenced to 4 years in jail for stealing 10,000 Baht’s worth of electric cable. Police handcuffed the shocked pair and led them away as their families cried on the bench behind us.

The irony of their harsh sentence was not lost on us as we compared it to the levity of that handed down to the boatman responsible for the death of Alan’s brother and the suffering of the other passengers. Not to mention the loss of income of several million dollars to the Thai tourist industry following holiday cancellations in Turkey, where the case was widely reported in the media.

Mr. H hadn’t bothered to turn up and the reason why was plain when his representatives informed the court that the offer of compensation had been reduced from 400,000 to 100,000 Baht.

Alan was very upset and refused to accept that amount of money. The defendant’s legal counsel completely dominated the proceedings and I could see that Alan’s lawyer appeared hopeless and intimidated.

It was virtually impossible for Alan to put his case until, when we realized the opposition were asking the court to postpone the proceedings for another full year, we [Alan& I] had to raise our hands for permission to talk. Luckily the Judge listened to us and scheduled the next meeting for 23rd January 2009 when, she advised, Mr. H and his full legal counsel must be present.
And so it was that on the 23th January, we returned to the court again. In the meantime Alan had had more meetings with government officials in Bangkok who, it seemed, were becoming more sympathetic to his cause. One government department had ordered their Pattaya counterparts to send observers to the court.

This time Mr. H was present and sat with an air of authority and confidence bordering on cockiness. It was fascinating to see the change in his demeanor as a small group of uniformed officials, the observers requested by Bangkok, entered the court. He showed obvious surprise and a sense of uneasiness.The judge was not the same as before but once again Alan’s lawyer was obviously scared of the defendant. He hadn’t prepared the necessary papers and his performance was borderline incompetence. I did my best to help as friend and interpreter but I was limited as to how much I could get involved in the court proceedings.

Unfortunately, the case was once again postponed – this time until the end of this year (2009).
Although downhearted, Alan was encouraged by the court appearance of the official observers. He had also decided to give his case more publicity, especially outside Thailand.

With this in mind it now seemed a good idea to Alan to broaden the spectrum of officialdom involved. So we went to see the head of the Pattaya Immigration Police, Police Colonel  Arnonnun Kamollut who gave us a warm welcome and showed a genuine interest in Alan’s case. He even contacted two top ranking officers of the Tourist police and invited them to join us together with a lawyer and his assistant and some other officials. We all had lunch together and spent nearly two hours discussing Alan’s case and its implications. I must admit this show of support was unexpected and was certainly a morale booster for Alan.

It was agreed they would use their contacts and influence to try and persuade Mr. H to show some understanding and come to an amicable agreement with Alan.

We left the immigration office feeling very optimistic and Alan returned to Bangkok.

At the Immigration with Tourist Police
Two weeks later, I received a call from the Pattaya Tourist Police. The news wasn’t good. They had approached various officials including the Pattaya City Mayor but no-one seemed interested in contacting Mr. H. Nobody cared.

And so, I have decided to publish Alan’s story. If we can’t help him here in Thailand, the least we can do is to bring his story to a wider international audience. Alan hopes that this will help Thailand to be a safer place. I also think there are some lessons to be learned here, for Thais and non-Thais alike.

I’m now back to my usual work routine again [with more emails from readers in need of help] but I still think of Alan every now and then.

Alan’s next day in court will be in December 2009. I know I’ll be there too and if anyone wants to join us, you are welcome.

Warina Punyawan
editor@pattayadailynews.com
20 March 2009

Meetings in Bangkok between Alan and Government officials have revealed some unbelievable, if not disturbing, facts.

It appears that the boat that sank near Koh Larn was not reported to the Bangkok Ministry of Transportation. No information or message was sent from Pattaya regarding the incident.
It was as if the vessel was a “ghost” boat which was never operated and could therefore never be involved in an accident.

The Inspector General of the Ministry of Transportation Khun Pawasut Chunganuwat was surprised to discover that everything was covered up in order to save the boat company, which was operating without no license or insurance.

The company didn’t need to go through the usual channels of authorisation, registration and insurance as, it seems, knowing influential people in the local government was enough insurance for them.

วันพุธที่ 27 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2551

How to help a friend who gets arrested in the middle of the night

It is 2 AM and someone you know has just been arrested. You know you need legal help. You do not want your friend to make a confession, be in a line-up, or even get fingerprinted if it can be avoided. It is tough to know what to do or who to trust. Moreover, you do not know who will even answer the phone at that time of day. Here is what you need to know if this happens in Pattaya.?

1. Find out where they are being held and by what police station. Whether you get the call from a police officer or your friend, make sure that this is the first thing you ask. If you can, tell your friend that you are finding a lawyer and not to answer any compromising police questions until that lawyer arrives. In short, the ‘name, rank, and serial number’ response will do fine. They should always cooperate, but the less said until a lawyer arrives, the better. Anything they say, even to you over the phone, can be used against them in court, and having a lawyer present as a defense mediation between them and the police is essential. Your friend must immediately say, “I want a lawyer” and the police cannot interrogate him (and don’t take the lawyer who was recommended by friendly police, who was hanging around him with a helpful face). Just keep saying “I want a lawyer”even if he has to repeat this again and again, it will save him from saying something that may be used against him in court. And don’t try to speak Thai because your Thai can never be good enough to understand what they are talking about, especially in this matter.

2. Ask what the actual charge is, and do not let them try to tell you what happened. The call is not privileged and it can, and probably will, be recorded by police for later use. If the arrested is an adult, the police are not required to tell a friend or family member anything.

3. Advise them to tell the officer they will not answer questions or take tests without a lawyer present. Tell them not to make any statements about any alleged offenses and tell them not to take any tests, with the exception of alcohol screening tests (see warnings), unless or until they get advice from a lawyer. Only the arrested subject can invoke his rights; you can not do it for them.

4. Find a criminal defense attorney. Keep calling lawyers you know or have their name cards until you find one that either answers their phone or has an answering service that can reach them anytime, day or night.

5. Tell the lawyer that your friend is arrested and give him the address of the Police Station, and as much information as you know. Many lawyers say, they will do this for free, but may request payment later of at least $100-$300 for that call.

6. Pay the lawyer in court and to post bail. A lot of people prefer to pay the police, remember it can never be ended!!. It is more important to get a good lawyer on the case early than to immediately get your friend out of jail.

 TIPS
Most minor crimes and traffic violations can be bailed out from the police station through the use of a desk appearance ticket or a desk sergeant’s bail.

Tell the lawyer you found that you will need his services for the purpose of securing your friend’s rights only for the night in question and possibly the next day at arraignment if that is scheduled; do not sign a long-term retainer without the accused’s participation.

 Any legal fee for standing in at arraignment should be either a flat fee, don’t pay hourly rate. Discuss the fee clearly and put it on writing.

 At the arraignment, (the formal reading of criminal charges, and entering the plea), you do not have to use the lawyer that helped originally. If the accused cannot afford to hire a lawyer, a public defender will be appointed to represent them. Often the best and most knowledgeable lawyers in the courthouse will be the public defenders, though they will invariably be the busiest as well, and will not be able to offer your friend as much time as a private attorney will. Your friend will probably be best served by hiring a private attorney, however, a public defender will be available if that is impossible. Avoid hiring lawyers who solicit you in the courthouse hallways!

 If you run into trouble finding out where your friend is being held and by what police station ( Pattaya, Sattahip, Banglamung, Dongtan) it depends where your friend was arrested.

 Remember, the best way to help with the problems associated with being arrested is to avoid the arrest in the first place. Keep out of fights, drink responsibly, drive responsibly, and help friends do so as well.
 This is a terribly embarrassing time. Keep the information on a need to know basis. Don’t call friends or co-workers of the jailed friend. If the friend will miss work because of the incarceration, you may want to consider asking your friend for their manager’s email or phone number and determine if they want the boss informed of the situation. If it is a secret, you should determine the most appropriate “reason” for your friends absence from work.

 Consider calling their parents, especially if you cannot or chose not to get involved. If your friend has an alcohol or drug problem, they may be trying to avoid parents. The parents may also be willing to assist you with the financial burden of getting your friend out of jail. They may choose to remain anonymous to avoid embarrassment.

Warnings


 In Pattaya, you have a very limited time or no right at all to contact a lawyer regarding alcohol testing. Also, refusal to take an alcohol test carries the same penalty as a test failure. Failure to submit to an alcohol screening test, in some states, will result in an automatic suspension of your driver’s license, since agreeing to take those tests was a condition of receiving your license. On the other hand, the person arrested may have a good reason not to permit a blood test, (e.g., presence of other substances in blood), as losing driving privileges might not be the biggest worry. Never ask the police for advice; they are paid to be against the arrested person. Get a lawyer on the phone as quickly as possible.

Written by: Warina Punyawan
Editor In Chief
Pattaya Daily News